Ok so im on the bus for my science classes' field trip and im reading my book minding my own business. as the trip goes on i cant help but hear this discusion that is going on across the aisle.
Two of my class mates were in a deep disscussion about the relevance of genetic enhancement to the human race as a whole. for awhile i just listened but then as i heard him going around in circles i couldnt help but join in. now dont get me wrong, i dont see a problem with genetic enhancements that would enable us to be more resistant to viruses and diseases such as AIDs and cancer. But this guy was talking about a whole new "evolutionary step" for the human race. cause he hasnt seen any changes at all. i decided that use the theory of evolution as fact for this arugment so as not to de rail the discusion to something totally different. so i asked him how long it takes for a species to evolve. instead of answering my question he stated that he hasnt seen any changes at all in the human race since the egyptians. he said that we have evloved as far as we can in the physical aspect. but its our inteligence that has not made any progress. so he proposes to make our brain capacity larger than it already is. i then pointed out to him that we already dont use about 70 - 80 % of our brain capacity. which indicates to me that we are not lacking in the smarts. but the time to USE all the space, we dont live long enough. he said that if humans were smart that we would have already been in space and exploring. i asked him what he was comparing them to. givin that time period what other race has made it into space? he then dodged it and said that he wasnt just talking about making it into space.
the main point of his is that inteligence and the physical being were 2 totally differnent things. which from that statement it would make sense that one doesnt nessecarily rely on the other. well he thinks that by making our cranial capcity bigger we can become smarter. as if inteligence is passed on. you must learn stuff. but set that aside. i left that cause it wasnt part of what i was trying to argue. i was trying to make him understand that there are morals in all of this. but he only thought of it as a tool. but it was part of evolution. evolution happens naturaly not with tools. it also arises from the need to adapt to some situation or need to be more efficient with our current resources. i asked him a few times what our need to addapt was. if he had said build in inmunites to what i mentioned at the begining i wounldnt have minded to much. but his whole point was that he didnt like the fact that human race hasnt changed much made him mad. it came down to it that he is on the evyromental bandwagon about us ruining our atmosphere and that humans would have to adapt to the changes quickly. so he is totally into pop culture or would that be cult culture? i dont know, either way its total crap. as i listened to him talk after the discussion it became apparent to me that he never knew what he was talking about. at the point that i knew he was a tree hugging loser, i just sat and listend to him. he was proposing that we splice the genetic qualities from star fish that let them regenerate their legs into humans so that we can heal faster and grow extra organs. that idea sounds like something that would come out of a 10 yr olds mouth that is totally into the X-Men.
I win.
Saturday, October 30, 2004
Thursday, October 28, 2004
FDA Approves Use of Chip in Patients
FDA Approves Use of Chip in Patients
Email this StoryOct 13, 4:44 PM (ET)
By DIEDTRA HENDERSON
WASHINGTON (AP) - Medical milestone or privacy invasion? A tiny computer chip approved Wednesday for implantation in a patient's arm can speed vital information about a patient's medical history to doctors and hospitals. But critics warn that it could open new ways to imperil the confidentiality of medical records.
The Food and Drug Administration said Wednesday that Applied Digital Solutions of Delray Beach, Fla., could market the VeriChip, an implantable computer chip about the size of a grain of rice, for medical purposes.
The news pleased investors. On Wednesday, Applied Digital shares were up $1.45, or 68.4 percent, at $3.57 on the Nasdaq Stock Market - near the middle of their 52-week range of $1.94 to $5.
With the pinch of a syringe, the microchip is inserted under the skin in a procedure that takes less than 20 minutes and leaves no stitches. Silently and invisibly, the dormant chip stores a code that releases patient-specific information when a scanner passes over it.
Think UPC code. The identifier, emblazoned on a food item, brings up its name and price on the cashier's screen. At the doctor's office the codes stamped onto chips, once scanned, would reveal such information as a patient's allergies and prior treatments, speeding care.
The microchips have already been implanted in 1 million pets. But the chip's possible dual use for tracking people's movements - as well as speeding delivery of their medical information to emergency rooms - has raised alarm.
"If privacy protections aren't built in at the outset, there could be harmful consequences for patients," said Emily Stewart, a policy analyst at the Health Privacy Project.
To protect patient privacy, the devices should reveal only vital medical information, like blood type and allergic reactions, needed for health care workers to do their jobs, Stewart said.
An information technology guru at Detroit Medical Center, however, sees the benefits of the devices and will lobby for his center's inclusion in a VeriChip pilot program.
"One of the big problems in health care has been the medical records situation. So much of it is still on paper," said David Ellis, the center's chief futurist and co-founder of the Michigan Electronic Medical Records Initiative.
As "medically mobile" patients visit specialists for care, their records fragment on computer systems that don't talk to each other.
"It's part of the future of medicine to have these kinds of technologies that make life simpler for the patient," Ellis said. Pushing for the strongest encryption algorithms to ensure hackers can't nab medical data as information transfers from chip to reader to secure database, will help address privacy concerns, he said.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on Wednesday announced $139 million in grants to help make real President Bush's push for electronic health records for most Americans within a decade.
William A. Pierce, an HHS spokesman, could not say whether VeriChip and its accompanying secure database of medical records fit within that initiative.
"Exactly what those technologies are is still to be sorted out," Pierce said. "It all has to respect and comport with the privacy rules."
Applied Digital gave away scanners to a few hundred animal shelters and veterinary clinics when it first entered the pet market 15 years ago. Now, 50,000 such scanners have been sold.
To kickstart the chip's use among humans, Applied Digital will provide $650 scanners for free at 200 of the nation's trauma centers.
In pets, installing the chip runs about $50. For humans, the chip implantation cost would be $150 to $200, said Angela Fulcher, an Applied Digital spokeswoman.
Fulcher could not say whether the cost of data storage and encrypted transmission of medical information would be passed to providers.
Ultimately, the company hopes patients who suffer from such ailments as diabetes and Alzheimer's or who undergo complex treatments, like chemotherapy, would have chips implanted. If the procedure proves as popular for use in humans as in pets, that could mean up to 1 million chips implanted in people.
The company's chief executive officer, Scott R. Silverman, is one of a half dozen executives who had chips implanted. Silverman said chips implanted for medical uses could also be used for security purposes, like tracking employee movement through nuclear power plants.
Such security uses are rare in the United States.
Meanwhile, the chip has been used for pure whimsy: Club hoppers in Barcelona, Spain, now use the microchip to enter a VIP area and, through links to a different database, speed payment much like a smartcard.
-------------------------------------------------
is it just me or is this like totally freaky? the last thing i need is a little chip with wireless capabilitys that has very little security. if its gonna have all my info like accounts, SSN, medical info, background info. thats just a little to risy for me. i can see maybe having like alergies and stuff like that on there. but why not jus put sumtin like that in yer wallet? or somtin that we can wear? the posibilties that i might be tracked are totally unaccept able. its no ones business but my own where i go on a daily basis. just have a little devise that senses' when it is on a human body and will sound an alert if it is taken off, for the work site tracking. like nuclear sites mentioned in the article, or maybe even military bases. but those should only be monitored from a closed system so that no one could hack it and then see the units positions and therefore make it easyer for an attack plan to be executed. i can understand animals. cause they dont have any privacy rights. we do however and someone tracking me with a satalite doesnt exactly appeal to me. sure i know they have satalights that can zoom in to the Nth degree and see me walkin but thats different then tracking my movements with a system implanted in my body.
if they start making ppl do that im gonna dig the thing out and watch them try and make me do it.
Email this StoryOct 13, 4:44 PM (ET)
By DIEDTRA HENDERSON
WASHINGTON (AP) - Medical milestone or privacy invasion? A tiny computer chip approved Wednesday for implantation in a patient's arm can speed vital information about a patient's medical history to doctors and hospitals. But critics warn that it could open new ways to imperil the confidentiality of medical records.
The Food and Drug Administration said Wednesday that Applied Digital Solutions of Delray Beach, Fla., could market the VeriChip, an implantable computer chip about the size of a grain of rice, for medical purposes.
The news pleased investors. On Wednesday, Applied Digital shares were up $1.45, or 68.4 percent, at $3.57 on the Nasdaq Stock Market - near the middle of their 52-week range of $1.94 to $5.
With the pinch of a syringe, the microchip is inserted under the skin in a procedure that takes less than 20 minutes and leaves no stitches. Silently and invisibly, the dormant chip stores a code that releases patient-specific information when a scanner passes over it.
Think UPC code. The identifier, emblazoned on a food item, brings up its name and price on the cashier's screen. At the doctor's office the codes stamped onto chips, once scanned, would reveal such information as a patient's allergies and prior treatments, speeding care.
The microchips have already been implanted in 1 million pets. But the chip's possible dual use for tracking people's movements - as well as speeding delivery of their medical information to emergency rooms - has raised alarm.
"If privacy protections aren't built in at the outset, there could be harmful consequences for patients," said Emily Stewart, a policy analyst at the Health Privacy Project.
To protect patient privacy, the devices should reveal only vital medical information, like blood type and allergic reactions, needed for health care workers to do their jobs, Stewart said.
An information technology guru at Detroit Medical Center, however, sees the benefits of the devices and will lobby for his center's inclusion in a VeriChip pilot program.
"One of the big problems in health care has been the medical records situation. So much of it is still on paper," said David Ellis, the center's chief futurist and co-founder of the Michigan Electronic Medical Records Initiative.
As "medically mobile" patients visit specialists for care, their records fragment on computer systems that don't talk to each other.
"It's part of the future of medicine to have these kinds of technologies that make life simpler for the patient," Ellis said. Pushing for the strongest encryption algorithms to ensure hackers can't nab medical data as information transfers from chip to reader to secure database, will help address privacy concerns, he said.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on Wednesday announced $139 million in grants to help make real President Bush's push for electronic health records for most Americans within a decade.
William A. Pierce, an HHS spokesman, could not say whether VeriChip and its accompanying secure database of medical records fit within that initiative.
"Exactly what those technologies are is still to be sorted out," Pierce said. "It all has to respect and comport with the privacy rules."
Applied Digital gave away scanners to a few hundred animal shelters and veterinary clinics when it first entered the pet market 15 years ago. Now, 50,000 such scanners have been sold.
To kickstart the chip's use among humans, Applied Digital will provide $650 scanners for free at 200 of the nation's trauma centers.
In pets, installing the chip runs about $50. For humans, the chip implantation cost would be $150 to $200, said Angela Fulcher, an Applied Digital spokeswoman.
Fulcher could not say whether the cost of data storage and encrypted transmission of medical information would be passed to providers.
Ultimately, the company hopes patients who suffer from such ailments as diabetes and Alzheimer's or who undergo complex treatments, like chemotherapy, would have chips implanted. If the procedure proves as popular for use in humans as in pets, that could mean up to 1 million chips implanted in people.
The company's chief executive officer, Scott R. Silverman, is one of a half dozen executives who had chips implanted. Silverman said chips implanted for medical uses could also be used for security purposes, like tracking employee movement through nuclear power plants.
Such security uses are rare in the United States.
Meanwhile, the chip has been used for pure whimsy: Club hoppers in Barcelona, Spain, now use the microchip to enter a VIP area and, through links to a different database, speed payment much like a smartcard.
-------------------------------------------------
is it just me or is this like totally freaky? the last thing i need is a little chip with wireless capabilitys that has very little security. if its gonna have all my info like accounts, SSN, medical info, background info. thats just a little to risy for me. i can see maybe having like alergies and stuff like that on there. but why not jus put sumtin like that in yer wallet? or somtin that we can wear? the posibilties that i might be tracked are totally unaccept able. its no ones business but my own where i go on a daily basis. just have a little devise that senses' when it is on a human body and will sound an alert if it is taken off, for the work site tracking. like nuclear sites mentioned in the article, or maybe even military bases. but those should only be monitored from a closed system so that no one could hack it and then see the units positions and therefore make it easyer for an attack plan to be executed. i can understand animals. cause they dont have any privacy rights. we do however and someone tracking me with a satalite doesnt exactly appeal to me. sure i know they have satalights that can zoom in to the Nth degree and see me walkin but thats different then tracking my movements with a system implanted in my body.
if they start making ppl do that im gonna dig the thing out and watch them try and make me do it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)