COWS
Is it just me, or does anyone else find it amazing that our government can track a cow born in Canada almost three years ago, right to the stall where she sleeps in the state of Washington. And they tracked her calves to their stalls. But they are unable to locate 11 million illegal aliens wandering around our country. Maybe we should give them all a cow.
CONSTITUTION
They keep talking about drafting a Constitution for Iraq. Why don't we just give them ours? It was written by a lot of really smart guys, it's worked for over 200 years and we're not using it anymore.
TEN COMMANDMENTS
The real reason that we can't have the Ten Commandments in a Courthouse! You cannot post "Thou Shalt Not Steal," "Thou Shalt Not Commit Adultery" and "Thou Shall Not Lie" in a building full of lawyers, judges and politicians! It creates a hostile work environment!
Sunday, January 23, 2005
Tuesday, November 02, 2004
The Bill of Non-Rights
The following has been attributed to State Representative
Mitchell Kaye from
GA. This guy should run for President one day...
"We the sensible people of the United States, in an attempt to help everyone get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid more riots, keep our nation safe, promote positive behavior, and secure the blessings of debt free liberty to ourselves and our great-great-great-grandchildren, hereby try one more time to ordain and establish some common sense guidelines for the terminally whiny, guilt ridden, delusional, and other liberal bed-wetters.
We hold these truths to be self evident: that a whole lot of
people are confused by the Bill of Rights and are so dim they require a Bill of NON-Rights."
ARTICLE I: You do not have the right to a new car, big screen TV,
or any other form of wealth. More power to you if you can legally acquire them, but no one is guaranteeing anything.
ARTICLE II: You do not have the right to never be offended. This
country is based on freedom, and that means freedom for everyone -- not just you! You may leave the room, turn the channel, express a different opinion, etc.; but the world is full of idiots, and probably always will be.
ARTICLE III: You do not have the right to be free from harm. If
you stick a screwdriver in your eye, learn to be more careful, do not expect the tool manufacturer to make you and all your relatives independently wealthy.
ARTICLE IV: You do not have the right to free food and housing.
Americans are the most charitable people to be found, and will gladly help anyone in need, but we are quickly growing weary of subsidizing generation after generation of professional couch potatoes who achieve nothing more than the creation of another generation of professional couch potatoes.
ARTICLE V: You do not have the right to free health care. That
would be nice, but from the looks of public housing, we're just not
interested in public health care.
ARTICLE VI: You do not have the right to physically harm other
people. If you kidnap, rape, intentionally maim, or kill someone, don't be surprised if the rest of us want to see you fry in the electric chair.
ARTICLE VII: You do not have the right to the possessions of
others. If you rob, cheat, or coerce away the goods or services of other citizens, don't be surprised if the rest of us get together and lock you away in a place where you still won't have the right to a big screen color TV or a life of leisure.
ARTICLE VIII: You do not have the right to a job. All of us sure
want you to have a job, and will gladly help you along in hard times, but we expect you to take advantage of the opportunities of education and vocational training laid before you to make yourself useful.
ARTICLE IX: You do not have the right to happiness. Being an
American means that you have the right to PURSUE happiness, which by the way, is a lot easier if you are unencumbered by an over abundance of idiotic laws created by those of you who were confused by the Bill of Rights.
ARTICLE X: This is an English speaking country. We don't care
where you are from, English is our language. Learn it or go back to wherever you came from!
(lastly....)
ARTICLE XI: You do not have the right to change our country's
history or heritage. This country was founded on the belief in one true God. And yet, you are given the freedom to believe in any religion, any faith, or no faith at all; with no fear of persecution. The phrase IN GOD WE TRUST is part of our
heritage and history, and if you are uncomfortable with it,
TOUGH!!!!
If you agree, share this with a friend. No, you don't have to, and
nothing tragic will befall you if you don't. I just think it's about time common sense is allowed to flourish.
Sensible people of the United States speak out because if you do
not, who will?
Vote - it's American as American can be...!
Let me hear a HELL YEA!!! if yall agree with these articles!
Mitchell Kaye from
GA. This guy should run for President one day...
"We the sensible people of the United States, in an attempt to help everyone get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid more riots, keep our nation safe, promote positive behavior, and secure the blessings of debt free liberty to ourselves and our great-great-great-grandchildren, hereby try one more time to ordain and establish some common sense guidelines for the terminally whiny, guilt ridden, delusional, and other liberal bed-wetters.
We hold these truths to be self evident: that a whole lot of
people are confused by the Bill of Rights and are so dim they require a Bill of NON-Rights."
ARTICLE I: You do not have the right to a new car, big screen TV,
or any other form of wealth. More power to you if you can legally acquire them, but no one is guaranteeing anything.
ARTICLE II: You do not have the right to never be offended. This
country is based on freedom, and that means freedom for everyone -- not just you! You may leave the room, turn the channel, express a different opinion, etc.; but the world is full of idiots, and probably always will be.
ARTICLE III: You do not have the right to be free from harm. If
you stick a screwdriver in your eye, learn to be more careful, do not expect the tool manufacturer to make you and all your relatives independently wealthy.
ARTICLE IV: You do not have the right to free food and housing.
Americans are the most charitable people to be found, and will gladly help anyone in need, but we are quickly growing weary of subsidizing generation after generation of professional couch potatoes who achieve nothing more than the creation of another generation of professional couch potatoes.
ARTICLE V: You do not have the right to free health care. That
would be nice, but from the looks of public housing, we're just not
interested in public health care.
ARTICLE VI: You do not have the right to physically harm other
people. If you kidnap, rape, intentionally maim, or kill someone, don't be surprised if the rest of us want to see you fry in the electric chair.
ARTICLE VII: You do not have the right to the possessions of
others. If you rob, cheat, or coerce away the goods or services of other citizens, don't be surprised if the rest of us get together and lock you away in a place where you still won't have the right to a big screen color TV or a life of leisure.
ARTICLE VIII: You do not have the right to a job. All of us sure
want you to have a job, and will gladly help you along in hard times, but we expect you to take advantage of the opportunities of education and vocational training laid before you to make yourself useful.
ARTICLE IX: You do not have the right to happiness. Being an
American means that you have the right to PURSUE happiness, which by the way, is a lot easier if you are unencumbered by an over abundance of idiotic laws created by those of you who were confused by the Bill of Rights.
ARTICLE X: This is an English speaking country. We don't care
where you are from, English is our language. Learn it or go back to wherever you came from!
(lastly....)
ARTICLE XI: You do not have the right to change our country's
history or heritage. This country was founded on the belief in one true God. And yet, you are given the freedom to believe in any religion, any faith, or no faith at all; with no fear of persecution. The phrase IN GOD WE TRUST is part of our
heritage and history, and if you are uncomfortable with it,
TOUGH!!!!
If you agree, share this with a friend. No, you don't have to, and
nothing tragic will befall you if you don't. I just think it's about time common sense is allowed to flourish.
Sensible people of the United States speak out because if you do
not, who will?
Vote - it's American as American can be...!
Let me hear a HELL YEA!!! if yall agree with these articles!
Saturday, October 30, 2004
OOOHH i love these great scientifical discusions
Ok so im on the bus for my science classes' field trip and im reading my book minding my own business. as the trip goes on i cant help but hear this discusion that is going on across the aisle.
Two of my class mates were in a deep disscussion about the relevance of genetic enhancement to the human race as a whole. for awhile i just listened but then as i heard him going around in circles i couldnt help but join in. now dont get me wrong, i dont see a problem with genetic enhancements that would enable us to be more resistant to viruses and diseases such as AIDs and cancer. But this guy was talking about a whole new "evolutionary step" for the human race. cause he hasnt seen any changes at all. i decided that use the theory of evolution as fact for this arugment so as not to de rail the discusion to something totally different. so i asked him how long it takes for a species to evolve. instead of answering my question he stated that he hasnt seen any changes at all in the human race since the egyptians. he said that we have evloved as far as we can in the physical aspect. but its our inteligence that has not made any progress. so he proposes to make our brain capacity larger than it already is. i then pointed out to him that we already dont use about 70 - 80 % of our brain capacity. which indicates to me that we are not lacking in the smarts. but the time to USE all the space, we dont live long enough. he said that if humans were smart that we would have already been in space and exploring. i asked him what he was comparing them to. givin that time period what other race has made it into space? he then dodged it and said that he wasnt just talking about making it into space.
the main point of his is that inteligence and the physical being were 2 totally differnent things. which from that statement it would make sense that one doesnt nessecarily rely on the other. well he thinks that by making our cranial capcity bigger we can become smarter. as if inteligence is passed on. you must learn stuff. but set that aside. i left that cause it wasnt part of what i was trying to argue. i was trying to make him understand that there are morals in all of this. but he only thought of it as a tool. but it was part of evolution. evolution happens naturaly not with tools. it also arises from the need to adapt to some situation or need to be more efficient with our current resources. i asked him a few times what our need to addapt was. if he had said build in inmunites to what i mentioned at the begining i wounldnt have minded to much. but his whole point was that he didnt like the fact that human race hasnt changed much made him mad. it came down to it that he is on the evyromental bandwagon about us ruining our atmosphere and that humans would have to adapt to the changes quickly. so he is totally into pop culture or would that be cult culture? i dont know, either way its total crap. as i listened to him talk after the discussion it became apparent to me that he never knew what he was talking about. at the point that i knew he was a tree hugging loser, i just sat and listend to him. he was proposing that we splice the genetic qualities from star fish that let them regenerate their legs into humans so that we can heal faster and grow extra organs. that idea sounds like something that would come out of a 10 yr olds mouth that is totally into the X-Men.
I win.
Two of my class mates were in a deep disscussion about the relevance of genetic enhancement to the human race as a whole. for awhile i just listened but then as i heard him going around in circles i couldnt help but join in. now dont get me wrong, i dont see a problem with genetic enhancements that would enable us to be more resistant to viruses and diseases such as AIDs and cancer. But this guy was talking about a whole new "evolutionary step" for the human race. cause he hasnt seen any changes at all. i decided that use the theory of evolution as fact for this arugment so as not to de rail the discusion to something totally different. so i asked him how long it takes for a species to evolve. instead of answering my question he stated that he hasnt seen any changes at all in the human race since the egyptians. he said that we have evloved as far as we can in the physical aspect. but its our inteligence that has not made any progress. so he proposes to make our brain capacity larger than it already is. i then pointed out to him that we already dont use about 70 - 80 % of our brain capacity. which indicates to me that we are not lacking in the smarts. but the time to USE all the space, we dont live long enough. he said that if humans were smart that we would have already been in space and exploring. i asked him what he was comparing them to. givin that time period what other race has made it into space? he then dodged it and said that he wasnt just talking about making it into space.
the main point of his is that inteligence and the physical being were 2 totally differnent things. which from that statement it would make sense that one doesnt nessecarily rely on the other. well he thinks that by making our cranial capcity bigger we can become smarter. as if inteligence is passed on. you must learn stuff. but set that aside. i left that cause it wasnt part of what i was trying to argue. i was trying to make him understand that there are morals in all of this. but he only thought of it as a tool. but it was part of evolution. evolution happens naturaly not with tools. it also arises from the need to adapt to some situation or need to be more efficient with our current resources. i asked him a few times what our need to addapt was. if he had said build in inmunites to what i mentioned at the begining i wounldnt have minded to much. but his whole point was that he didnt like the fact that human race hasnt changed much made him mad. it came down to it that he is on the evyromental bandwagon about us ruining our atmosphere and that humans would have to adapt to the changes quickly. so he is totally into pop culture or would that be cult culture? i dont know, either way its total crap. as i listened to him talk after the discussion it became apparent to me that he never knew what he was talking about. at the point that i knew he was a tree hugging loser, i just sat and listend to him. he was proposing that we splice the genetic qualities from star fish that let them regenerate their legs into humans so that we can heal faster and grow extra organs. that idea sounds like something that would come out of a 10 yr olds mouth that is totally into the X-Men.
I win.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)